 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Kosobucki v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA03-1262,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellant mother failed to provide adequate addendum and record in appeal of termination of her parental rights, and she failed to provide explanation for deficiencies, due to absence of complete record, appellate court was compelled to affirm.
|
|||||
| Lamar Outdoor Adver. v. Ark. Highway & Transp. Dep't, CA 03-411,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS TWO AND THREE, May 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Advertising company's request to erect highway billboard on commercial property was properly denied where property was located in a residential subdivision, predominately residential, and subject to a bill of assurance limiting it to residential use.
|
|||||
| Lindsey v. State, CA CR 03-1031,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 26, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) did not apply to defendant's situation, because he had pleaded nolo contendere to the charges in question and therefore there was nothing "untried" as set forth in the IAD.
|
|||||
| Morgan v. State, CACR03-587,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for three counts of delivering cocaine was proper where the evidence was sufficient and where a chain of custody was properly established.
|
|||||
| Rowe v. State, CACR 03-959,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: For defendant to allege on appeal that it was error for the trial court to ask him a question about his involvement in a Bible study ran counter to the doctrine of invited error, as he had saturated the sentencing hearing with such testimony.
|
|||||
| Safeco Corp. v. Boyer, CA03-1240,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, May 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported the decision to award a 40 percent impairment rating to the employee's earning capacity after it correctly considered all factors. The Second Injury Fund was not liable for the employee's previous injuries.
|
|||||
| Shepherd v. St. Edward Mercy Med. Ctr., CA03-1081,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Hospital was properly granted summary judgment in connection with a hospital visitor's action for personal injury damages; she failed to prove that the hospital knew or should have known that a sprinkler head over which she tripped posed a risk.
|
|||||
| Widen v. State, CA CR 03-895,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 26, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Probable cause existed for a search warrant for defendants' home where it was based on officers' observations of one defendant, who purchased at various stores materials used to manufacture methamphetamine and returned to the home address afterward.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
