 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Overton v. Jones, CA 00-642,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Proper venue for action to determine paternity and custody of a minor child upon death of its mother was in county where child resided with grandfather, not county where biological father resided.
|
|||||
| Pathfinder Sch., Inc. v. Fisher, CA00-1346,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation commission did not err in finding causal connection between injury suffered by employee and her subsequent back surgery. Disc herniation was aggravated by injury to point where nerve-root compression resulted.
|
|||||
| Pinson v. Wofford, CA 00-1054,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an employment dispute over payment of wages, general jury verdict upheld where no basis could be discerned from the record. Jury was entitled to assess the weight and credibility of the evidence.
|
|||||
| Riesenhuber v. Rental Serv. Corp., CA 00-1396,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' compensation commission did not err in denying claim for expenses caused by additional medical treatment and disability for back injury, where employee had pre-existing spondylosis, bone spurs, degenerative disc disease, and stenosis.
|
|||||
| Spurgeon v. State, CACR00-462,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Despite the State's violation of discovery orders, appellant's concession to possession of 12 ounces of marijuana provided sufficient evidence to sustain delivery conviction such that testimony as to prior sales was not prejudicial.
|
|||||
| Turnbough v. Mammoth Spring Sch., CA 00-1207,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Teacher who resigned after 20 years of teaching at a school was not entitled by statute or contract to payment for 90 days of her unused sick leave.
|
|||||
| U.S. Elec. Motors v. Harrison, CA00-1336,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where issues concerning award of disability benefits were based entirely upon weight and credibility of evidence, they were within the sole province of workers' compensation commission, and appellate court owed deference to it.
|
|||||
| Wagner v. Wagner, CA 00-1244,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order granting motion to relocate the parties' minor child was appropriate where mother met burden of proving some real advantage to the child and herself with regard to the move.
|
|||||
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Woods, CA 00-1419,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence supported workers' compensation commission's finding additional medical treatment for claimant was necessary, as well as its grant of claimant's request for change of physician, because previous physician left area.
|
|||||
| Washington v. State, CACR00-1206,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 6, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was not error for the trial court to refuse to give an incorrect jury instruction. Also, there was no rational basis for the jury to find appellant did not commit aggravated robbery. Thus, his conviction was affirmed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
