Arkansas, May, 2003, State Case law

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

State Courts - Arkansas - May 28, 2003

S. Aluminum Mfg. v. Reed, CA02-01351, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 28, 2003, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Workers' Compensation Commission did not err when it affirmed ALJ's decision awarding injured employee temporary total disability benefits, where both treating physicians opined employee was unable to work and recommended further medical treatment.

Search Cases for Free

Sanford v. State, CACR02-897, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 28, 2003, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Defendant hit victim, left, returned a short time later, shot the victim twice, and then verbally invited the victim to go tell the police. The jury was not left to speculation and conjecture in deciding defendant acted with premeditation.

Search Cases for Free

Tucker v. State, CACR 02-1270, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 28, 2003, Decided
View this case - free

Overview: Trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence, where, while reliability of informant had not been fully established, affidavit provided basis for finding probable cause that contraband would be found at defendant's home.

Search Cases for Free

Williams v. Williams, CA 02-453, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 28, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free

Overview: Trial judge's child support order made according to the child-support chart, uneven distribution of marital property, uneven distribution of marital debt, and valuation of the husband's medical practice were affirmed in a divorce action.

Search Cases for Free

Winbush v. State, CA CR 02-864, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 28, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free

Overview: Because a jury convicted defendant on the most serious charge, murder in the first degree, a trial court did not err in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of negligent homicide.

Search Cases for Free

Communities Portal