 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Rose v. Rose, CA05-1139,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: During a divorce proceeding, the husband gave inconsistent testimony and resisted compliance with discovery requests, which resulted in additional costs and fees that the wife was forced to incur. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by awarding $ 10,000 to the wife for fees and costs under Ark. Code Ann. § 9-12-309(a)(2).
|
|||||
| Rouse v. Rouse, CA05-1338,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where appellant sought review of the distribution of settlement proceeds in a wrongful death action, he failed to provide an abstractor addendum sufficient to conduct a meaningful review. In accordance with Ark. Sup. Ct. & Ct. App. R. 4-2(b)(3), a rebriefing was ordered.
|
|||||
| Vicari v. Garrison, CA05-955,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order holding that mother owed a child support arrearage of $ 11,692 was upheld because although mother testified that she was seeking a setoff, she failed to obtain a ruling on issue by the trial court. The trial court did somewhat address the setoff issue in its ruling from the bench, but its written order did not address the setoff issue at all.
|
|||||
| Wallace v. State, CACR05-1127,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 14, 2006, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant did not object to the court's failure to impose a verdict on the theft by receiving charge in violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-36-106 at trial, and defendant did not object when defendant orally pronounced the sentence at the sentencing hearing, the issues were waived on appeal, and defendant's conviction was affirmed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
