 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Porter v. State, CACR06-1114,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's conviction for possession of methamphetamine, a violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-401, was reversed because the State offered no evidence that a usable amount of the contraband existed; as a practical matter, defendant possessed bags which had had methamphetamine in them, and that was not a crime pursuant to Harbison and the statute.
|
|||||
| Wyne v. State, CACR06-1233,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 30, 2007, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: At close of State's case-in-chief, defendant's counsel moved for a directed verdict. But, counsel did not renew motion until after trial judge had provided the jurors with instructions. Thus, under Ark. R. Crim. P. 33.1, defendant's renewed motion was untimely, and appellate court was precluded from reaching the merits of the sufficiency challenge.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
