 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Anderson v. State, CR 01-1131,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 29, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's death sentence was reversed and resentencing was ordered because a verdict form concerning mitigating circumstances was not signed or filed: the court was unable to say that the jury considered any possible mitigating circumstances.
|
|||||
| City of W. Helena v. Sullivan, 02-1154,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 29, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because the action brought by the taxpayer against the city was an illegal-exaction suit, it was a constitutionally created class action as a matter of law, and the city's interlocutory appeal was dismissed.
|
|||||
| Coggins v. Coggins, 03-417,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 29, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where ex-husband appealing a divorce order failed to seek from the trial court a second extension of time to file the appellate record, the Arkansas Supreme Court declined to issue a writ of certiorari to complete the appellate record.
|
|||||
| Conley v. State, CR 02-779,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 29, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where, when petitioning for certiorari, defendant presented to court certified copy of docket sheet he wished to make part of appellate record, court permitted supplementation of record, and petition for certiorari was moot.
|
|||||
| Hoover v. State, CR 02-1150,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 29, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: While the State's amendment to the information changed the degree of the crime in violation of the statute, there was no surprise and no prejudice to defendant. Defendant could not raise errors having to do with the death penalty.
|
|||||
| In re Rules of the Supreme Court of Ark. & Court of Appeals of Ark. 4-1 & 4-2, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL],
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 29, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, CR 03-170,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 29, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Lamere v. State, CR 02-155,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 29, 2003, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant did not demonstrate that the issues on appeal could not be decided without a supplemental record. Defendant would not have prevailed on his postconviction relief issues had counsel raised them on appeal.
|
|||||
| McCullough v. State, 02-873,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 29, 2003, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to show that the attorney was in contempt for interrupting the judge and arguing with him. The attorney's jail sentence was reduced from 10 days to three days, with credit for time served.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
