Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - Arkansas - June 2, 2005
  
Baptist Health v. Murphy, No. 04-430, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 2, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Circuit court had to make findings in accordance with Ark. R. Civ. P. 65(e) on issue of doctors' likelihood success on the merits; appellate court was uncertain of circuit court's basis for concluding that doctors would ultimately prevail at trial. Under Ark. Sup. Ct. & Ct. App. R. 4-2(b)(3), the corporation was ordered to submit a proper brief.

Search Cases for Free
  
Bellew v. State, No. CR 04-663, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 2, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Black v. State, No. CR 05-461, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 2, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
City of Fort Smith v. Didicom Towers, Inc., 04-678, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 2, 2005, Opinion delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court did not err in dismissing a declaratory judgment action, pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. ? 16-111-108, on the ground that the issues present in the city's declaratory-judgment suit would be determined in a federal case that a telecommunications company was preparing to file between the parties in federal court.

Search Cases for Free
  
Danzie v. State, No. CR 04-381, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 2, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Green v. State, CR 04-1356, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 2, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant had a right to appeal the denial of his Ark. R. Crim. P. 26.1 motion; however, he assured the circuit judge that he was entering his guilty plea voluntarily, knowingly and without being threatened or coerced into doing so. Defendant also responded that he was satisfied with his attorneys. There was no right to counsel under the rule.

Search Cases for Free
  
Hannah v. State, No. CR 05-443, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 2, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's motion for appeal was untimely where he failed to file for an extension of time and offered no explanation for the delay; defendant failed to perfect an appeal and did not state a good cause for not tendering the record in a timely manner.

Search Cases for Free
  
Henderson v. Lay, No. 05-247, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 2, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Court denied petitioner's motion for belated appeal of denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus because petitioner established no good cause for his failure to comply with the time limitations. Although petitioner claimed that he placed the documents in the prison mail, he was solely responsible for depositing his brief with the clerk.

Search Cases for Free
  
Mayer v. State, No. CR 84-104, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 2, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Court denied petitioner's motion to obtain copy of the transcript lodged on direct appeal so that she could mount a collateral attack on her first-degree murder conviction because she did not show that there was some specific documentary evidence to support an allegation that could not be raised without her having possession of copy of transcript.

Search Cases for Free
  
Pierce v. State, CR 04-1013, SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 2, 2005, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant's convictions for felony theft of property and breaking and entering were improper pursuant to the Sixth Amendment and Ark. Const. art. 2, ? 10 where the trial court erred in forcing him to be represented by counsel and in refusing to allow him to appear pro se and in failing to apprise him of the dangers of self-representation.

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.