 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Newcourt Fin., Inc. v. Canal Ins. Co., 99-1249,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 25, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An award of attorney's fees for an appeal was based on the same rules for awarding attorney's fees for actions taken at trial.
|
|||||
| Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Willis, 99-1147,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 25, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No jurisdiction, as lower court order did not cover all parties and their claims in action raising collateral estoppel or res judicata to bar paternity action following inconsistent findings on paternity against third party.
|
|||||
| Pratt v. State, CR 98-1532,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 25, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court improperly denied appellant's petition claiming ineffective assistance of counsel; the appellant did not have to raise the issue below to be able to bring it on appeal.
|
|||||
| Reynolds v. State, CR 98-1184,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 25, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defense counsel's failure to object to jury instruction that permitted jury to find appellant guilty of first-degree murder with intent required for second-degree murder was reversible error and new trial was warranted.
|
|||||
| Sera v. State, CR 98-1222,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 25, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was not an abuse of discretion to admit evidence of prior bad acts (the evidence was highly relevant to prove defendant's modus operandi) or expert testimony (plaintiff's expert's knowledge was beyond ordinary knowledge).
|
|||||
| State v. Larimore, CR 99-618,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 25, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because State's withholding of evidence of wife's time of death was Brady violation and there was reasonable probability that appellee would not have been convicted, had it been disclosed, grant of writ of coram nobis affirmed.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
