 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bobby Cox Bail Bonds, Inc. v. State, CA CR 00-54,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, September 27, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant obligated to guarantee criminal defendant's appearances until discharge or final judgment, and because neither of these conditions had been met, bond remained in force, and forfeiture proper when defendant escaped at trial.
|
|||||
| Box v. State, CACR 99-1439,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, September 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Bragg v. Morgan, CA 99-1135,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, September 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant failed to produce evidence of any fraud, so the trial court did not err in entering summary judgment regarding a forfeiture of a vehicle he used to deliver cocaine.
|
|||||
| Cates v. Director, Empl. Sec. Dep't, E 00-62,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, September 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Clark v. Randolph County, CA 00-44,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, September 27, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Road grader was not a vehicle designed for transportation, and qualified as special mobile equipment exempt from motor vehicle registration laws, which meant it did not have to be insured under the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act.
|
|||||
| Eason v. State, CACR99-1506,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, September 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's sentence was within the range allowable under state law considering the crimes of which she was convicted and her status as an habitual offender; thus, appellant was precluded from arguing that the sentence was excessive.
|
|||||
| Eddins v. Style Optics, Inc., CA 99-1355,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, September 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a probate action, appellees' claims for attorney's fees and costs were properly awarded as an expense of estate administration, and the estate was not entitled to a setoff for the administrative claims.
|
|||||
| Henson v. Henson, CA 00-68,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, September 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Father was granted custody of his children after he demonstrated that mother tried to alienate them from him, that she claimed to have internet relationship with rock star, and that she had severe financial problems.
|
|||||
| Holt v. State, CACR 00-55,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, September 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence that manufacturing of methamphetamine took place in accomplice's house and that appellant touched bottles containing an ingredient used in process and jars containing finished drug was sufficient to support drug conviction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
