 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Bryant v. State, CACR00-1284,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appeal from conviction for commercial burglary affirmed where defendant failed to preserve sufficiency of evidence challenge by moving for dismissal at close of evidence by addressing lesser-included offense in directed verdict motion.
|
|||||
| Bush v. State, CACR00-1435,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence presented in prosecution for aggravated robbery was sufficient to support conviction where defendant was an accomplice of another person in the commission of the offense.
|
|||||
| Calloway v. State, CACR00-1317,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's failure to make inquiry into whether defendant was competent to proceed pro se was not clearly erroneous as defendant was not incarcerated, only fined for charge of harassing communications.
|
|||||
| Columbia Mut. Ins. Co. v. Home Mut. Fire Ins. Co., CA 00-1154,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Statutory provisions specifying amount of notice given to mortgagee when insurance policy was cancelled applied only to insurers and not to policyholders who unilaterally cancelled policy.
|
|||||
| Dallas County Hosp. v. Daniels, CA 00-1403,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 13, 2001, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial evidence existed to support workers' compensation commission's finding that employee proved an intradiscal electrothermal treatment was reasonably necessary to treat her compensable back injury.
|
|||||
| DeWitt v. Johnson, CA00-1240,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court held that counsel had authority to settle case. Appellate court held that the order was not appealable because it did not determine the action. Thus, the matter was ongoing and trial court dismissed the appeal.
|
|||||
| Engebretson v. State, CACR00-1330,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in failing to strike appellant's statement from the record regarding the victim's sexual relationship with her boyfriend, as appellant made no motion to strike the remark; thus, it remained part of the record.
|
|||||
| Haygood P'ship v. Whisenant, CA 00-1253,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because there was substantial evidence that employee suffered no incapacity to earn wages during the six years between his work-related accident and his injury diagnosis by a doctor, the limitations period for benefit purposes was not triggered.
|
|||||
| Hernandez v. State, CACR 00-1413,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly refused to allow appellant's counsel to inform jury during closing argument of guilt phase of trial that convicting appellant of charged felony would eliminate the possibility of recommending a suspended sentence.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, CACR 00-1194,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 13, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant, convicted of assault, failed to provide abstract to appellate court for review. Even if the court were to reach merits of defendant's appeal, evidence was sufficient to sustain conviction.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
