 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| First Cmty. Bank v. Paccio, CA 99-1473,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 31, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant creditor failed to prove that the notices informing appellee debtors of the sale of repossessed collateral met statutory requirements; thus, it was barred from obtaining a deficiency judgment against appellees.
|
|||||
| Howell v. Scroll Techs., CA99-1132,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of appellant employee's benefits for occupational disease reversed as medical testimony establishing causal relationship with employment to reasonable degree of medical certainty was arbitrarily disregarded.
|
|||||
| Jacobs v. State, CACR 99-1166,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Substantial circumstantial evidence supported the convictions because appellant's truck was near a crime scene and a computer, a tire iron's grooves and paint matched the scene, and appellant gave conflicting statements.
|
|||||
| Lindquist v. Arkansas Oil & Gas Comm'n, CA99-1306,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment forcing integration of plaintiffs' interests in drilling unit with other owners affirmed; court had subject matter jurisdiction over action, and Oil & Gas Commission's findings were supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Pizzimenti v. AAA Storage Ctr., Inc., CA99-1237,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In workers' compensation case, appellant did not suffer any wage loss at the time of the injury; appellant was allowed to work; appellant was entitled to attorney's fees on eight percent permanent impairment benefits.
|
|||||
| Purtle v. Myers, CA99-1100,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because summary judgment for appellee and an award of delinquent rent to appellee was not a final, appealable order, appellant's appeal was dismissed because the appellate court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
|
|||||
| Robinson v. Robinson, CA 99-1380,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Order affirmed; nothing in writing supported appellant's contention that certificates of deposit conveyed to son prior to father's death were partial performance of executory contract entered into between appellant and father.
|
|||||
| Smith v. Hot Springs Village Prop. Owners Ass'n, CA 99-1236,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Doctrine of res judicata applied to workers' compensation claim where final adjudication on merits of issue occurred and barred relitigation of any matter litigated or that could have been litigated in first case.
|
|||||
| White v. State, CACR 99-788,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, May 31, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Revocation of appellant's probation affirmed where it was established by a preponderance of the evidence that appellant inexcusably failed to comply with certain terms and conditions of that probation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
