 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Payne v. McExpress, Inc., CA03-1368,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, June 2, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Considering lack of evidence establishing causal connection between work incident and a claimant's physical problems, plus the fact that the claimant had a related pre-existing condition, a denial of worker's compensation benefits was proper.
|
|||||
| Schueller v. Schueller, CA 03-486,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 2, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in dismissing husband's petition for quarterly accounting of child support payments, where he failed to demonstrate accounting was warranted; he paid $ 570 per month and wife paid $ 250 per month for medical insurance alone.
|
|||||
| State v. Graydon, CA 03-489,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 2, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred in granting defense motion to transfer rape case to juvenile division: defendant was 17 when he committed rape, he caused tear in 14 year-old victim's vaginal area requiring surgery and hospitalization, and he had a prior offense.
|
|||||
| Top Quality Badges, Inc. v. Smith, CA03-384,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, June 2, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court's order granting summary judgment was not a final, appealable order, where it did not address one of the parties' counterclaims.
|
|||||
| Tucker v. Tucker, CA03-1312,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 2, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court reversed suspension of mother's visitation rights; as more than a year had passed since initial suspension, alternative means to overnight visitation were to be considered despite problems in the mother-child relationship.
|
|||||
| Williams v. State, CACR03-1056,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 2, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although defendant's information and judgment referred to the wrong enhancement statute, the jury instructions and oral instructions of the trial court revealed its intention to enhance under another statute and was not an illegal sentence.
|
|||||
| Witcher v. McGhee, CA 03-1231,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 2, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in refusing to grant day care operators new trial on issues of waiver and estoppel, as the appellate court did not intend to require the trial judge to conduct a new trial, or it would have expressly directed him to do so.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
