Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - Arkansas - June 21, 2006
  
Pest Mgmt. v. Langer, CA05-1387, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court erred in denying pest management company's motion to arbitrate claims asserted by homeowners under Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), 9 U.S.C.S. ?? 1 through 16, where the parties' agreement specified that any dispute would be arbitrated under the FAA, and any dispute over applicability of provision would be resolved through arbitration.

Search Cases for Free
  
Rial v. Boykin, CA05-995, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Court erred in awarding judgment to plaintiff in her suit against defendants for declaration that she was rightful owner of disputed grave sites where court did not take into account fact that defendants acquired easement to use sites via their clear establishment of family burial plot in accordance with practices and procedures in effect at time.

Search Cases for Free
  
Ross v. State, CACR05-1298, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: A trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion for a new trial pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. ? 16-89-130(c)(4) because while he proffered a jury instruction for constructive possession of methamphetamine, he did not proffer an instruction regarding lesser-included offenses; hence, he was not entitled to relief.

Search Cases for Free
  
Wilson v. State, CACR05-1013, COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND TWO, June 21, 2006, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Court did not err in denying defendant's motion to suppress his statements made to law enforcement officers where it could not be said that false promises of leniency were made to him. Defendant was 30 years old and had been in and out of criminal justice system for several years. Each time he was questioned, he was reminded of his Miranda rights.

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.