 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Baldwin v. Baldwin, 01-1258,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 30, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court did not err in remanding appeal to allow husband to re-abstract appellate brief, and supreme court affirmed chancery court's decision after supplemental abstract failed to cure the deficiencies in the first abstract.
|
|||||
| Buckley v. State, CR 01-644,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 30, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no error in the decision to refuse to accept defendant's attempt to waive a jury on resentencing. Defendant did not demonstrate prejudice by having a different jury sentence him, as his sentence was less than his original sentence.
|
|||||
| Campbell v. State, CR 01-1181,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 30, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's appeal was abated, and he was afforded opportunity to cure deficiencies in his abstract, addendum, and appellate brief before appellate court would affirm for noncompliance with appellate rules.
|
|||||
| Clay v. State, CR 01-469,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for rehearing of affirmation of denial of post-conviction was denied. Defendant had been warned to file substituted abstract, yet did not do so.
|
|||||
| D.B. Griffin Warehouse, Inc. v. Sanders, 01-716,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 30, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court erred by denying a warehouse's motion for a directed verdict in a wrongful death suit, where there was no evidence presented that there was a latent danger in the roof about which the warehouse had a duty to warn the deceased.
|
|||||
| Davenport v. Lee, 01-456,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 30, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant administrators' motion to stay, or in the alternative to recall the supreme court's mandate dismissing their wrongful death action, was denied as devoid of any citation to authority showing legal or factual error in the opinion.
|
|||||
| Jackson v. Mundaca Fin. Servs., 01-893,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 30, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Assignee was barred from raising issue of whether it was holder in due course in its motion for reconsideration, where it was not plead as affirmative defense; therefore, trial court erred by setting aside original judgment for debtors.
|
|||||
| Lake View Sch. Dist. No. 25 v. Huckabee, 01-836,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 30, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court granted State's motion for extension of time to prepare a new abstract, but denied public schools' motion for sanctions and for summary dismissal.
|
|||||
| USA Check Cashers of Little Rock, Inc. v. Island, 01-1294,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, May 30, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Class certification for consumers against check cashing company was proper as the proposed class representatives were more than adequate. Order granting class certification was separate from a judgment which delved into the merits of a case.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
