 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Adams v. State, CACR 01-964,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence corroborated defendant's accomplice's testimony, including defendant's presence at crime scene, his possession of materials to manufacture methamphetamine, and his false testimony concerning overwhelming chemical odor.
|
|||||
| Alexander v. Alexander, CA01-1246,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because Arkansas statutory law precluded a grant of divorce without corroboration of residency of one of the parties, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the divorce decree.
|
|||||
| Anderson v. Roy Ross Ford Lincoln Mercury, CA01-813,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The workers' compensation commission was allowed to adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the administrative law just as its own after conducting a de novo review of the record.
|
|||||
| Bellew v. State, CACR01-778,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where evidence of defendant's guilt in murder convictions was overwhelming, and defendant showed no specific proof of prejudice in questionable testimony, any error in allowing brother-in-law's testimony was harmless.
|
|||||
| Booth v. Booth, CA01-479,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Divorce decree distributing property was modified to show freezer belonged to ex-husband, and affirmed as modified. Appellate court deferred to chancellor's credibility determination as to ex-husband's uncorroborated testimony.
|
|||||
| Burmeister v. Richman, CA 01-1336,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 5, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court erred by finding grantor rebutted presumption of delivery of a deed, as grantor's conduct was not inconsistent with delivery of the deed where she, as a joint tenant, merely retained an interest in deeded property.
|
|||||
| Capel v. Allstate Ins. Co., CA01-1305,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment for insurance company was improper where insured who suffered carbon monoxide poisoning from negligent roof repair put forth affidavits on issues regarding insurance company's recommendation and agreement to indemnify contractor.
|
|||||
| Chism v. ALCOA, CA01-655,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of workers' compensation benefits for hearing loss, based on statute of limitations and failure to show estoppel by virtue of employer's conduct, was affirmed. Statute of limitations was two years from first awareness of hearing loss.
|
|||||
| Clenney v. State, CACR01-985,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 5, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to uphold conviction for first-degree sexual-abuse conviction, and regarding introduction of controlled substance into body of another charges, defendant did not preserve argument that confessions were not corroborated.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
