 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Cox, 01-1021,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 6, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where mother fled Florida as proceedings were started to terminate parental rights of her children, mother gave birth to infant in Arkansas, and probate court gave grandmother guardianship of infant, Florida court had no jurisdiction over infant.
|
|||||
| Cole v. Laws, 01-1329,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 6, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where former client sued lawyer for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty over alleged mistaken terms in settlement agreement, partial summary judgment for lawyer on breach of fiduciary claim was proper where lawyer did not engage in self-dealing.
|
|||||
| Davie v. Office of Child Support Enforcement, 01-1250,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 6, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court could not order child-support payments from the father where the father's income from which the payments were to be made was based solely on SSI benefits. Disability was not an unreasonable cause for a reduction in earnings.
|
|||||
| Fairchild v. State, CR 01-856,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 6, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In attack on officer, the vicious nature of the attack alone could allow the jury to infer that defendant acted with premeditation to support attempted capital murder charge, and defendant's custodial, but spontaneous statements, were admissible.
|
|||||
| Fields v. State, CR 01-127,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 6, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Defendant's argument that the pretrial photo lineup should not have been admitted by the trial court was barred for review because defendant did not object to the in-court identifications. Evidence was sufficient to convict.
|
|||||
| Henderson v. State, CR 01-616,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Henderson v. State, CR 01-1299,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 6, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Without defendant's motion and affidavits for new trial and designation of the record on appeal, supreme court could not undertake review of defendant's appeal, and returned the appeal for compliance with supreme court rules.
|
|||||
| Higgins v. Burnett, 01-801,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 6, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in granting defendants' motion to dismiss based on improper venue, where defendants failed to raise the defense of improper venue by motion or responsive pleading within 20 days after service of process.
|
|||||
| Holmes v. McClendon, 01-1303,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 6, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where husband was personal representative of his wife's and daughter's estates, and he hired attorney to represent himself and parents, the beneficiaries of wife's estate, attorney had no conflict of interest from simultaneous representation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
