 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Beal Bank v. Thornton, CA 99-435,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 7, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In foreclosure proceeding, chancellor erred in finding appellees adversely possessed. Appellees were legal owners and appellant had no right of entry. One had to have right of entry before another could hold adversely to him.
|
|||||
| Brake v. Kroger Co., CA99-1350,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Letter from appellant's treating surgeon describing appellant's injuries was properly excluded as untimely in workers' compensation case as it was signed by surgeon five days after the discovery cutoff date.
|
|||||
| Chaney v. Brown's Sod Farm, CA99-1437,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: No evidence of negligence affirmed; appellants alleged appellee violated OSHA standards, however, never presented any evidence of OSHA violations in the case. The point was neither argued nor ruled upon.
|
|||||
| Drumwright v. State, CACR99-1338,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In probation revocation matter, court could not find that revocation of appellant's probation based on possession of firearm was clearly against a preponderance of the evidence.
|
|||||
| Dutton v. State, CACR99-887,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION TWO, June 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where evidence supported charges of either rape or incest, the prosecutor's election was within his discretion; and a daughter's retrieval, on her own initiative, of evidence from the home she had lived in was not illegal.
|
|||||
| Guest v. San Pedro, CA 99-1001,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 7, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In child support dispute, it was unnecessary that chancellor use words "best interest of the child" when chancellor considered those interests in finding guidelines to be unjust and considering other financial obligations.
|
|||||
| Johnson v. State, CA CR 99-1220,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS ONE AND TWO, June 7, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence of appellant's loud cursing at police officers in public, stripping off shirt, and making fist in defiance of officer was sufficient to sustain conviction for failure to submit to arrest and disorderly conduct.
|
|||||
| Jones v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., CA 99-1015,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 7, 2000, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because father lost privilege to receive visitors in jail and had to serve the remaining 15 and a half years in prison due to revocation of probation, father's parental rights to three-year-old daughter were terminated.
|
|||||
| Little Rock Sheet Metal v. Smith, CA99-1474,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 7, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment affirmed; workers' compensation commission's decision that employee's carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger thumb arose out of a prior work-related injury to his thumb was supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
