 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Ark. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Hicks, 01-916,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 13, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where insurer sold husband Medicare supplemental insurance, although husband was already receiving Medicaid benefits, and husband and wife sued insurer, chancery court did not abuse its discretion by certifying suit as class action.
|
|||||
| Brunson v. State, CR 01-1172,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 13, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: State's witness, while a bona fide expert on domestic abuse, exceeded her expertise by profiling batterers who would kill and by conveying to jury that defendant fell within that profile. Witness's testimony should have been excluded.
|
|||||
| Butler v. State, CR 01-487,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 13, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court properly denied defendant's motion to introduce evidence of victim's prior inconsistent statements that would have violated rape-shield statute, and properly allowed testimony of other victims under the so-called "pedophile exception."
|
|||||
| Dewitt v. Johnson, 01-1346,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 13, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where client contested settlement, but attorney testified that he advised client to settle and took her silence as approval to settle, the court properly exercised its discretion in crediting the attorney's testimony and enforcing the agreement.
|
|||||
| Hall v. Pulaski County Sheriff's Dep't, 02-331,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellate court denied inmate's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on motion to compel clerk to file untimely record in civil appeal regarding FOIA request as inmate had not shown original claim had substantial merit.
|
|||||
| Heffernan v. State, CR 02-239,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for habeas corpus was properly denied where defendant raised only one allegation within purview of statute, i.e. that he could have been exonerated by DNA testing, and he conceded that the scientific evidence was available at trial.
|
|||||
| Jamison v. State, CR 02-356,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although defendant field notice of appeal with prosecutor and attorney general within 30 day time period, there was no proof he mailed notice to circuit court within 30 days; thus, motion for belated appeal was denied.
|
|||||
| Shackleford v. Terry, 02-23,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of parole to prisoner who committed second aggravated robbery was proper where act disallowing parole to persons serving sentence for second aggravated robbery conviction complemented, rather than conflicted, with subsequent act.
|
|||||
| Walker v. State, CR 02-384,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 13, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
