 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| American Abstract & Title Co. v. Rice, 03-754,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 17, 2004, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Arkansas Committee on the Unauthorized Practice of Law did not have exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether or not a title company committed an improper act by charging document fees during real estate transactions, and a class action was proper.
|
|||||
| Bright v. Zega, 04-044,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 17, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Former client's legal malpractice claim against former attorney and his firm was properly dismissed for failure to state a claim, where complaint was based on attorney's court-approved withdrawal and client did not appeal from the withdrawal order.
|
|||||
| Deere v. State, CR 03-761,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 17, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of defendant's motion to correct a sentence was affirmed, because defendant did not produce a proper record on appeal and a review of the record showed that the sentence imposed was proper.
|
|||||
| Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Sauer, 04-127,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 17, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Interest rate limitation set forth in the Arkansas Constitution applied to all judgments; therefore, a 10 percent post-judgment interest award was improper because it exceeded the constitutional rate of 8.25 percent in a particular tort case.
|
|||||
| Henderson v. Simes, CR 04-566,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 17, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Adoption of SCD, 03-1283,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 17, 2004, Opinion delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because father legitimated child by filing with putative father registry, initiating petition to determine paternity, and taking action to establish parentage, trial court correctly ruled his consent was required before adoption could occur.
|
|||||
| In re Castleman, No. 04-637,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 17, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| In re Darling, No. 04-636,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 17, 2004, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Jenkins v. State, CR 03-578,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 17, 2004, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial without a hearing of the inmate's motion for post-conviction relief was affirmed, because, based on the record, the inmate had not identified any issue that would point to ineffective assistance of counsel or warrant review.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
