 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Maynard v. Belden Wire & Cable, CA01-1403,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 19, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employers were not in contempt as evidence supported the finding that the employee was not denied access to the physician and the employers granted treatment. There were delays in paying pharmacy bills, but the balance was ultimately paid.
|
|||||
| Mays v. State, CACR01-1088,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION FOUR, June 19, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for felon in possession of firearm was affirmed. As defendant admitted to only one element of crime, firearm possession, not the entire crime, corpus delicti rule did not require corroboration of his confession.
|
|||||
| Miller v. Pro-Transportation, CA 02-83,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 19, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgment grant to trucking company was proper as exculpatory clause in passenger authorization form the injured passenger signed was valid. Its language clearly and specifically set out negligent liability to be avoided.
|
|||||
| Rogers v. Rogers, CA01-790,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION THREE, June 19, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was insufficient corroboration of residency by the mother, as there was no substantial evidence of her residency for 60 days prior to filing the complaint. There was no evidence of unconscionability concerning the premarital agreement.
|
|||||
| Ross v. State, CACR 01-859,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISION ONE, June 19, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted for simultaneous possession of drugs and firearms and for other drug offenses, court did not err by denying his motion to suppress evidence and statement made to police and by denying his motion for directed verdict.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
