 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Sharp v. Lewis Ford, Inc., CA 01-1115,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS THREE AND FOUR, June 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Employee's treatment by three physicians was not authorized, as employee failed to follow change of physician protocol. Moreover, employee's additional claims of head injury incurred in her fall was not supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Yen My Tran Vo v. Hoa Van Vo, CA 01-908,
COURT OF APPEALS OF ARKANSAS, DIVISIONS THREE AND FOUR, June 26, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where mother's petition for relocation was denied, and father's motion for modification of custody was granted, it was error to grant father's motion, since, inter alia, educational status and attitude of his family did not justify custody change.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
