 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Berger v. State, CR 02-350,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Motion to extend time to file criminal appeal brief was granted. Motion for appointment of counsel was denied as no merit to appeal had been shown.
|
|||||
| Cook v. State, CR 02-140,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| F&G Fin. Servs. v. Barnes, 01-1376,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Class certification was properly granted to the representatives as the claims of the consumers against the check cashing companies were typical of the claims of the class and the representatives were adequate persons to serve as representatives.
|
|||||
| F&G Fin. Servs. v. Barnes, 01-1356,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Ruling that check-cashers' contracts' arbitration agreements were unenforceable for unconscionability against customers, in customers' suit for usurious interest, was upheld.
|
|||||
| Howard v. State, No. CR00-803,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| Mallory v. Hartsfield, Almand & Grisham, LLP, 01-1407,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although one party's brief had some pleadings relevant to summary judgment motion granted against him, his failure to include several other documents required to decide appeal meant he needed to submit revised brief containing those documents.
|
|||||
| Money Place v. Barnes, 01-1374,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Elements of adequacy of class representative, typicality, and superiority were met in class representative's action against lender, where representative showed minimal level of interest in action, assisted attorneys, and all claims were similar.
|
|||||
| Montgomery v. Bolton, 01-827,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The mandatory Tier II withholdings from the father's, a railroad employee, paychecks did not form part of disposable income under child support laws and the Tier II withholdings were part of railroad retirement deductions.
|
|||||
| Nichols v. Arnold, 01-961,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
