 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Seagrave v. Price, 01-1370,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As trial court made no reference in its findings as to mother's fitness as custodial parent and failed to give her presumption regarding her opinions with respect to rearing her child, grandparent visitation law was unconstitutionally applied.
|
|||||
| Short v. State, CR 01-1269,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant was convicted of first-degree sexual abuse for sexually assaulting a child under the age of 14, knowledge, or even a reasonable belief of the victim's age, was eliminated as a defense and the State did not have to prove the same.
|
|||||
| State v. Goff, CR 01-1051,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Grant of postconviction relief was reversed where defendant failed to prove that but for attorney's alleged error concerning conflicting information in an affidavit, there was a reasonable probability defendant would have been acquitted of murder.
|
|||||
| Stringfellow v. State, CR 02-328,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where defendant failed to raise the grounds advanced in his coram nobis petition when he could have done so at the time of trial, he did not show that there was any good cause to permit him to proceed with a review of the denial of his petition.
|
|||||
| THE/FRE, Inc. v. Martin, 01-1373,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When class members alleged that service fees charged in connection with check-cashing transactions were loans, and were usurious, the court properly found adequacy of representation, typicality, and superiority requirements to certify class were met.
|
|||||
| THE/FRE, Inc. v. Martin, 01-1371,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Denial of check-casher's motion to compel arbitration, and determination that arbitration provision was unenforceable and unconscionable was upheld. Provision lacked mutuality.
|
|||||
| Thomas v. State, CR 01-974,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: As trial court's statutory power to reduce punishment assessed by jury was harmonious with, and complementary to, jury's power to fix punishment, trial court did not err in placing defendant on probation after jury imposed prison term.
|
|||||
| Tyson Foods, Inc. v. ConAgra, Inc., 01-737,
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS, June 27, 2002, Opinion Delivered
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court erred in finding that the nutrient profile was a trade secret and was correct in granting the motion for JNOV. There was no proof that the corporation took steps to swear their employees to secrecy about the nutrient profile.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
