 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hunt v. Superior Court, S063313,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, November 22, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In determining eligibility for subsistence medical care, counties must consider a resident's financial ability to pay the costs of obtaining care.
|
|||||
| People v. Arndt, No. G021783.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, November 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence enhancements under Cal. Penal Code § 23182 stayed pending completion of enhancements imposed pursuant to §12022.7; imposition of two injury-related enhancements due to single injury by each victim was improper.
|
|||||
| Roberts v. Sentry Life Ins., No. B125515.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, November 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an action alleging malicious prosecution of an earlier suit, evidence that the trial court in the earlier suit denied a defense summary judgment motion established that there was probable cause to bring the earlier suit.
|
|||||
| Wilcox v. Birtwhistle, No. S074519.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, November 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: permits the withdrawal or amendment of deemed admissions.
|
|||||
| In re Charles C., No. G023963.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, November 23, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Drugs found in search of juvenile properly admitted where search was authorized incident to lawful arrest for curfew violation; detention at police station for curfew violation did not violate statute or federal Constitution.
|
|||||
| In re Randy S., No. E023152.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, November 23, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was sufficient evidence that defendant, who was 11 years old, possessed requisite specific intent required for juvenile court adjudication that defendant committed lewd act upon child.
|
|||||
| Iverson v. Berwald, No. B129174.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, November 23, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Law firm's action was barred by two-year statute of limitations because promissory note issued by law firm to collect payments for prior legal services rendered did not constitute a valid enforceable written contract.
|
|||||
| People v. Scott, No. A086057.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, November 23, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The State established corpus delicti of the felony drunk driving charge because there was a reasonable inference from circumstantial evidence that appellee was the driver of the abandoned vehicle.
|
|||||
| People v. Watts, No. A083194.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, November 23, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court found that the evidence supported the finding that defendant personally used a firearm during the crimes; the conviction of defendant comported with due process and did not violate the principles of judicial estoppel.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
