 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| KENDALL-JACKSON WINERY, LTD. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS COUNTY, F033305,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 3, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Adan, No. B127112.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Expert testimony did not violate the statute as there was no opinion expressed that had the required fraudulent intent; court properly controlled cross-examination; defendant waived any claim of error to jury instructions.
|
|||||
| People v. Mancebo, F028473,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 4, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under pleadings alleged in information, imposition of firearm-use enhancement resulted in improper sentence, but imposing this enhancement at one-third the upper term, as opposed to mid-term, on subordinate counts affirmed.
|
|||||
| People v. Stewart, No. D032206.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 4, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The extent of the child victim's injuries and the force necessary to produce them provided substantial evidence to support the element that a reasonable person would have likely believed that a small child could suffer great bodily injury.
|
|||||
| Albertson v. Superior Court, B135604,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 5, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: District attorney was not entitled to direct access to petitioner's mental health records in sexually violent predator proceedings because an existing statute strictly prohibited such transfer of these confidential materials.
|
|||||
| People v. Johnson, No. C028945.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court held that admission of a defendant's prior domestic violence in a prosecution for an offense involving domestic violence, did not violate defendant's right to due process.
|
|||||
| Sporich v. Superior Court, No. B135605.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 5, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Writ of mandate commanding court to set aside order requiring further psychiatric interviews of petitioner was issued, as district attorney did not come forward with compelling proof of good cause for additional examinations.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
