 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| 6 Angels v. Stuart-Wright Mortgage, No. B128163.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Mortgage company's negligent clerical error, made when instructing auction service concerning the opening bid on property, fell outside the procedural requirements for foreclosure sales and was not grounds to void the sale.
|
|||||
| Distefano v. Forester, No. D035333.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 2, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiff's negligence claim involving an off-roading motorcycle accident because plaintiff assumed the risk of participating in off-roading.
|
|||||
| Echevarrieta v. City of Rancho Palos Verdes, No. B138366,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 3, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: City ordinance that required appellant to trim the trees that obstructed his neighbor's view was a valid exercise of the state's police powers and did not violate the respective takings clauses of the United States or California Constitutions.
|
|||||
| Golden Eagle Refinery Co. v. Associated Internat. Ins. Co., No. B132448.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 3, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In an indemnity action against its third-party liability insurance carriers, a company could not distinguish between covered and non-covered acts that contaminated its refinery property; therefore, it did not establish a prima facie case.
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. BARCHEERS, D036109,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Mower, F030690,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 3, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Mazurette, No. S081661.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 4, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conclusion that defendant could not appeal following a deferred entry of judgment was affirmed. Order granting deferred entry of judgment was not a final appealable order and appeal was properly dismissed.
|
|||||
| Vacanti v. State Comp. Insurance Fund, No. S071945.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 4, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Only plaintiffs' abuse of process and fraud claims, as well as their unfair competition claims not pertaining to insurance companies' racketeering violations were barred by workers' compensation exclusivity.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
