Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - January 2 - January 3, 2007

  
Barnett v. Superior Court, C051311, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Concerned McCloud Citizens v. McCloud Community Services Dist., C050811, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: An agreement between a community services district and a water bottling company for the purchase and sale of spring water did not constitute "approval" of a project within the meaning of CEQA, where the agreement did not give the company any vested rights and did not legally commit the district to a definite course of action.

Search Cases for Free

  
Kennedy v. Superior Court, C052243, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
North Kern Water Storage Dist. v. Kern Delta Water Dist., F047706, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 2, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In determining the extent of a forfeiture under Cal. Const., art. X, ? 2, and Wat. Code, ? 1241, the trial court correctly adopted a monthly measure as a method of minimizing the forfeiture because the parties to the water rights dispute maintained monthly but not daily records regarding their historical beneficial use of water for irrigation.

Search Cases for Free

  
Calvert v. County of Yuba, C047857, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc., D048064, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Plaintiff met requirements of Code Civ. Proc., ?? 415.40, 416.10, for service of process on out-of-state corporate defendant and presented sufficient proof of service under Code Civ. Proc., ? 417.20, subd. (a), because the person who signed return receipt for summons and complaint was an employee who regularly received mail on defendant's behalf.

Search Cases for Free

  
Oroville Hospital v. Dept. of Health Services, C049827, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Parsons v. Superior Court, No. CV064670, APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, MARIN COUNTY, January 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where challenge to notice in unlawful detainer action extended beyond the face of complaint to the issue whether 30-day notice or 60-day notice was required under California's Floating Home Residency Law, trial court was to resolve issue by resorting to competent evidence, and motion to quash service of summons was proper procedure for doing this.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. James Dylan Popular, F049564, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 3, 2007, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top