 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of Glendale v. Superior Court, No. B152057.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Superior court erred in holding that the city was precluded from pursuing a claim for punitive damages; plain language of statute permitted all plaintiffs, both public and private, to recover punitive damages in appropriate cases.
|
|||||
| In re Muhammed C., No. H022642.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Evidence was sufficient to sustain defendant's conviction for obstructing officer where he approached police car with suspect in the back, spoke with suspect, and refused to back away when officers order him to do so.
|
|||||
| In re Riordan, No. S009038.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Attorney's failure to respond to order to show cause for failing to file a timely opening brief on defendant's appeal was an act occurring within the immediate view and presence of the court and constituted direct contempt.
|
|||||
| Maldonado v. Superior Court, No. B153616.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Peremptory writ of mandate was issued directing trial court to vacate its order denying former employees' motions to compel further responses from former employer and enter a new and different order granting the motions.
|
|||||
| People v. Cox, No. D032205.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A violation of the sex offender registration statute required actual knowledge of the duty to register; however, an appellant's mere forgetfulness was not a defense.
|
|||||
| People v. Seneca Ins. Co., B148121,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 7, 2002, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Bail bond forfeiture was reversed with instructions for the trial court to exonerate the bond because the trial court failed to comply with the penal code requirement of stating its reasons for continuing bond pending sentencing.
|
|||||
| People v. Sotello, No. F035027.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Finding of defendant's prior strike was reversed and remanded for retrial where res judicata and collateral estoppel were not applicable as bar to retrial on prior strike, where initial finding of true was not supported by substantial evidence.
|
|||||
| Sandoval v. Bank of Am., No. D035974.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 7, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment in favor of bank in wrongful death case was reversed. It was more likely than not that an outcome more favorable to decedent's relatives would have resulted absent trial court's erroneous answer to jury's inquiry during deliberation.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
