 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Emery v. Visa Internat. Serv. Ass'n, No. C036193.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Absent an agency relationship between the credit card corporation and its merchants, there was no basis for contending that it was liable for violations of the anti-lottery criminal statutes or the unfair competition.
|
|||||
| Huntington Beach City Council v. Superior Court, Nos. G030042, G030075.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: It was error for the trial court to strike relevant statements from a ballot initiative.
|
|||||
| Piscioneri v. City of Ont., No. E029472.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a city employee's disability case, the trial court was required to consider administrative remedies before deciding the legal and equitable defenses raised by the city.
|
|||||
| Susag v. City of Lake Forest, No. D038608.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 8, 2002, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Criminal convicted of resisting or obstructing police officer was precluded from maintaining action against peace officers based on officers' conduct during arrest, unless conviction was set aside through appeal or postconviction proceedings.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
