LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - California - January 11 - January 12, 2006

  
Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Dept. of Forestry & Fire Protection, A104828, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Monterroso v. Moran, B182553, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court's order entering a mutual restraining order enjoining wife and her husband from committing specific acts of abuse against one another was reversed because it failed to make detailed findings, as required by Fam. Code, § 6305, that both parties acted primarily as aggressors and neither acted primarily in self-defense in a past incident.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Fulcher, E036773, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Evidence that was obtained for a proceeding in which defendant was found to be a sexually violent predator was admissible under Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600, subd. (a)(3), because it was for purposes of establishing that his prior conviction for committing lewd acts upon a child under age 14 involved force, duress, and substantial sexual conduct.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Ruiz v. Harbor View Community Assn., G034912, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Strebel v. Brenlar Investments, Inc., A104681, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 11, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In an action arising from a premature sale of real property, induced by a real estate agent's statements regarding a potential purchase property, a reasonable measure of damages under Civ. Code, §§ 1709, 3333, was the amount by which the value of the prematurely sold property appreciated after the fraudulently induced sale.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Tate, F047529, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Trial court's order was correct to the extent it ordered the Department of Corrections to apply Pen. Code, § 2933, to inmate's conviction for nonviolent in-prison offense. Although Pen. Code, § 2933.1, subd. (a), applied to a prisoner's entire sentence, it only did so to the extent the prisoner was serving time for a violent offense.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jaramillo v. State Bd. for Geologists & Geophysicists, D045949, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Business owner's contract with a landowner to locate groundwater and expert testimony that the contract was for geophysical services constituted substantial evidence that the business owner was practicing geophysics for others in California without a license in violation of Bus. & Prof. Code, § 7872, subd. (a).

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Jaramillo v. State Bd. for Geologists & Geophysicists, D045949, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 12, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.