Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - January 12 - January 14, 2009

  
Birke v. Oakwood Worldwide, B203093, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 12, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Resident of an apartment complex pleaded a cause of action for public nuisance under Civ. Code, ?? 3479, 3480, 3493, sufficient to withstand a demurrer when she alleged that the presence of secondhand smoke interfered with her use and enjoyment of the outdoor facilities by aggravating her allergies and asthma; special injury under ? 3493 was shown.

Search Cases for Free

  
Paduano v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., D050112, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 12, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Summary judgment on car purchaser's state law deceptive advertising claims was error because provisions of federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, 49 U.S.C. ? 32901 et seq., that regulated fuel economy estimates and labels did not preempt every lawsuit that challenged any statement an automobile manufacturer made regarding fuel economy.

Search Cases for Free

  
People ex rel. DuFauchard v. United States Financial Management, Inc., D052320, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 12, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: California Corporations Commissioner had authority under Gov. Code, ?? 11180, 11181, subd. (e), and Fin. Code, ?? 12305, 12106, subds. (a)(1), (b), to investigate a suspected Prorater Law, Fin. Code, ? 12000 et seq., violation involving conduct in California pertaining to nonresidents; the presumption against extraterritoriality did not apply.

Search Cases for Free

  
Pine Terrace Apartments, L.P. v. Windscape, LLC, F054609, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 12, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In an action alleging latent construction defects, a cross-complaint by seller-developers against subcontractors was not barred by the 10-year statute of limitations in Code Civ. Proc., ? 337.15, because the cross-complaint incorporated by reference the complaint's allegations of willful misconduct, within the exemption in ? 337.15, subd. (f).

Search Cases for Free

  
In re Gaul, B209638, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 13, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Denial of parole under Pen. Code, ? 3041, was reversed because the evidence did not support a finding that the inmate currently posed a threat to public safety, even though there was "some evidence" to support a description of the commitment offense (second degree murder-for-hire) as carried out with a callous disregard for the victim's suffering.

Search Cases for Free

  
UAS Management, Inc. v. Mater Misericordiae Hospital, F053553, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 13, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Ameriloan v. Superior Court, No. B203548, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 14, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
Mossman v. City of Oakdale, F054983, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 14, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Arbitrator did not fail to decide an issue within the meaning of Code Civ. Proc., ? 1283.4, in an award indicating that an employee was to be reinstated and made whole; although the award did not order reinstatement into a specific position or calculate lost wages and benefits, clarification could be obtained by remanding to the arbitrator.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Harbert, A118186, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 14, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Because there was abundant evidence from which the jury could conclude that defendant knew he had struck a human being, the trial court did not err in instructing on the knowledge requirement of Veh. Code, ? 20001, with CALJIC No. 12.70; defendant's knowledge could be imputed based in part on evidence of defendant's post-accident conduct.

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Stanphill, C056038, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 14, 2009, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Where victim's unsworn hearsay statement to law enforcement officer that tied defendant to victim's battery was admissible as a spontaneous statement under Evid. Code, ? 1240, defendant was not denied his U.S. Const., 6th Amend., right to confront and cross-examine victim at his probation revocation hearing because no further inquiry was required.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top