Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - California - January 5, 2005
  
PEOPLE v. QUINTERO, D043269, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. RACCA, E033754, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. REGINALD MAURICE FAIR, A104335, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. RODRIGUEZ, B165444, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. TENORIO, B173085, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS, D043160, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
People v. Bautista, F043279, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was not denied his right to jury trial when the trial court found his current weapons offense to be a serious felony for enhancement purposes; the jury's finding of a gang related felony was tantamount to a jury finding of a serious felony.

Search Cases for Free
  
People v. Sorenson, H026774, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: DUI defendant was adequately advised of potential fines and assessments to which a guilty plea would subject him; because fines and penalty assessments were not made part of defendant's plea agreement, their imposition did not violate agreement.

Search Cases for Free
  
RASANA v. SAN DIEGO TRANSIT, D042318, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
SUZANNE M. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SONOMA COUNTY, A108019, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 5, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.