 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Arya Group v. Cher, No. B128557.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiff's noncompliance with statute requiring it to secure signed, written contract for construction of single-family residence did not absolutely foreclose it from seeking to enforce oral agreement made with defendant.
|
|||||
| Canal St. v. Sorich, No. A082950.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Dismissal of a case for failure to bring it to trial was reversed where there had been a settlement agreement in open court that effectively disposed of the matter, even though details of execution remained.
|
|||||
| In re Tameka C., No. S068192.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction and sentence was upheld because the sentence for each separate assault should have been enhanced by a separate firearm-use enhancement even when the firearm was used on a single occasion and involved a single act.
|
|||||
| People ex rel. Lockyer v. Sun Pac. Farming Co., No. F029664.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment and injunction issued by pest control district and state administrative agency mandating removal of citrus tristeza virus (CTV) infected trees upheld where statute delegating legislative and quasi-judicial authority was constitutional.
|
|||||
| Wells Fargo Bank v. Superior Court, No. S057324.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 13, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In this action for an accounting, a trustee could provide a report of information to beneficiaries without having to disclose privileged communications.
|
|||||
| Carlton v. Quint, No. B119887.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 14, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The alleged defective service and inadequate notice claims were waived when appellant filed an opposition, appeared at the hearing, and argued the merits; appellant's own conduct created delays causing dismissal of the prior case.
|
|||||
| McDonald v. Dep't of Motor Vehicles, No. D032919.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 14, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The Colorado driving while ability impaired statute was "substantially similar" to the California driving under influence statute and could be used as a license suspension enhancement by California under California's Vehicle Code.
|
|||||
| People v. Shroff, D032479, D032495,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 14, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The motions for relief that were filed after the date of the amendment that precluded expungement of appellees' convictions were denied because the amendment was not retroactive or an ex post facto law.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
