 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| PEOPLE v. VASQUEZ, B173767,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 6, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. WILLIAMS, D043512,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 6, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| PEOPLE v. YARBER, C046521,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 6, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Christian, B168038,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 6, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a robbery case, defendant's plea was not knowing and voluntary because the trial court, although it advised defendant of his right to a jury trial, failed to advise defendant of his rights to confront witnesses and against self-incrimination.
|
|||||
| People v. Lopez, S119294,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 6, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: First degree murder was violent felony that was punishable by imprisonment in state prison for life and therefore was not subject to 10-year criminal street gang enhancement. Court of appeal thus erred in affirming sentence that included enhancement.
|
|||||
| Sierra View Local Health Care Dist. v. Sierra View Medical Plaza Associates, F043467,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 6, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a condemnation proceeding, no misconduct occurred when the jury considered the condemning entity's historical use of the property, although the jury was instructed not to value the property with reference to its value to the condemning entity.
|
|||||
| VIEW v. SIERRA VIEW MED. PLAZA ASSOCS., F043467,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 6, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| WEST MARINE, INC., H026869,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 6, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| WHEAT v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO., B172558,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 6, 2005, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
