 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Century-National Ins. Co. v. Glenn, No. C028573.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Homeowners insurance policy exclusion applied where defendant's criminal conviction was admissible to show that he had committed a crime that foreseeably could have resulted in bodily injury to another.
|
|||||
| Choate v. County of Orange, G020621,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Petition for rehearing with respect to attorneys' fees in civil right case was denied, and court modified its earlier opinion. There was no abuse of discretion with respect to determination of whether the victory was de minimus.
|
|||||
| Gordon v. Horsley, No. A088568.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Although California sheriff's deputy's rights to carry a weapon and make arrests could have been limited by sheriff in an appropriate case, reprimand letter imposing limitations was punitive action subject to administrative review.
|
|||||
| People v. Lee, F028940,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 17, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The court denied murder defendants' motions for rehearing and modified its opinion to specifically state special circumstances and premeditation were found true. Specific intent to kill did not have to apply to a specific person or persons.
|
|||||
| People v. Peracchi, No. F031202.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After arrestee indicated he intended to invoke his right to remain silent during custodial interrogation, police officer violated Miranda when he persisted to ask arrestee questions as to why he did not want to waive his rights.
|
|||||
| Sanchez-Scott v. Alza Pharms., No. B137678.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 17, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Where breast cancer patient sued for invasion of privacy after doctor allowed drug salesman to watch the examination, the complaint was sufficiently alleged. Thus, the demurrers to the action should not have been sustained.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
