|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case
for free through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more.
lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
|
| |
State Courts -
California - January 18 - January 19, 2006
|
| |
|
| |
Renteria v. Juvenile Justice, Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, C049717,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 18, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Denial of juvenile inmate's petition to file a late claim under Gov. Code, § 911.6, subd. (b)(1), was error where a secretary in his attorney's office erroneously removed the six-month public entity statute of limitations from the attorney's calendaring system because attorney's reliance on his existing office calendar system was not unreasonable.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
People v. Allegheny Casualty Co., A107069,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 19, 2006, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The technical requirements mandated by Pen. Code, § 1305, subd. (a), for bail forfeiture were not satisfied, where the trial court did not make an express declaration, made while it was in public session, that bail was forfeited.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|