|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
California - January 11, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
In re Player, D047042,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: State prison inmate who was removed from a credit-qualifying work assignment as a result of a disciplinary finding that was later vacated was entitled to favorable behavior points under Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15, ? 3375.4, subd. (a), for periods as to which he was awarded "S" time under Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15, ?? 3045.3, 3043.6, subd. (c)(2).
|
|
| |
Kurwa v. Harrington, Foxx, Dubrow & Canter, LLP, B187363,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a tortious interference action by a doctor against lawyers representing the doctor's associate, a letter from the lawyers to the president of an HMO was not of public interest under Code Civ. Proc., ? 425.16, the anti-SLAPP statute, because the letter concerned a private matter as to who would reap the benefits of a provider agreement.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Samples v. Brown, A112343, A112594,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 11, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: In a case in which a citizen challenged statutory provisions pertaining to impoundment of vehicles, the statutory phrase "mitigating circumstances" in Veh. Code, ? 14602.6, subd. (b), was not unconstitutionally vague on its face. The mitigating circumstances standard was reasonably specific and certain when viewed in context.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback