Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
   State Courts - California - January 7, 2005
  
PEOPLE v. MORTON, E035992, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. NETTERVILLE, B173174, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. RIVAS, B171183, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. SHAW, D042877, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. SHEPARD, D043415, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PEOPLE v. TEASLEY, G034098, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
PETTY v. HILL, D042562, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
People v. Harrison, D043081, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Although defendant made bizarre statements and counsel expressed concern regarding his client's competency, record did not contain substantial evidence of defendant's incompetence, and trial court did not err in failing to hold a competency hearing.

Search Cases for Free
  
People v. Spence, E035322, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was properly convicted of driving with invalid driver's license, although he lacked actual knowledge that his license was suspended, under public welfare statute for which legislature did not intend that knowledge or intent element apply.

Search Cases for Free
  
SALAS v. VIKING INS. CO., B168903, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 7, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free
  
Back to Top
  


Copyright© 2011 LexisNexis®, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.