 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Palmer v. Truck Ins. Exch., S074326,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, December 6, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Umbrella policy providing coverage for infringement of title did not require insurer to provide reimbursement to plaintiff, where mark infringed was not name of literary or artistic work.
|
|||||
| Pearlson v. Does 1 to 646, No. B130931.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, December 6, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court's dismissal of plaintiff's claims against unnamed defendants was dismissed, where plaintiff's failed to demonstrate that he had any significant potential to determine identity of a viable defendant.
|
|||||
| People v. Thomas, S075090,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, December 6, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Under the California Three Strikes Law, defendant, who had been previously convicted of two serious felonies, was entitled to presentence conduct credits.
|
|||||
| Valley Casework v. Comfort Constr., No. D031096.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, December 6, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In specific performance of arbitration provision case, by denying injunction, court went beyond scope of contractual issues presented, into equitable arena of subrogation law, but failed to resolve issues correctly.
|
|||||
| County of L.A. v. City of L.A., No. B135287.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, December 7, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: There was no statutory authority for defendant to appeal from an order fixing the amount of a preliminary injunction bond after defendant had already appealed from an order granting a preliminary injunction request.
|
|||||
| People v. Woodson, A083204,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, December 7, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Provision extending the waiting period to apply for a certificate of rehabilitation did not constitute punishment because it was not punitive and its burden was no more onerous than that necessary to achieve rehabilitation.
|
|||||
| Wolf v. Mitchell, No. B119999.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, December 7, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trust beneficiary was permitted to bring an action against attorneys who allegedly actively participated in a trustee's breaches of fiduciary duty, as an exception to the general rule that only a trustee could bring such an action.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
