 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| City of San Diego v. Dunkl, No. D035559, No. D035585.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Summary judgments in action for declaratory relief were affirmed where pre-election review of proposed initiative was appropriately carried out and trial court reached correct legal conclusions that initiative made only administrative decisions.
|
|||||
| Gulf Insurance Co. v. TIG Insurance Co., No. B135799.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: After exegesis of subrogation and contribution, the court determined that plaintiff's claim of breach of implied covenant would have been based in subrogation, except that the principal had no such claim to which plaintiff could be subrogated.
|
|||||
| McCormick v. Travelers Ins. Co., No. A088300.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs' suit against private insurer in state court was properly dismissed, as federal statute granted original exclusive jurisdiction to federal courts to hear claims arising out of flood insurance policies issued under federal program.
|
|||||
| People v. Cromer, No. S076444.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Standard of review in determining whether the State exercised reasonable diligence in securing victim's presence at trial was de novo, review rather than abuse of discretion. Where State's efforts failed to measure up, conviction properly reversed.
|
|||||
| People v. Palmer, No. B140436.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 22, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's conviction for continuous sexual abuse was not an enumerated offense under the One Strike law; therefore the trial court erred in applying the statute in sentencing appellant.
|
|||||
| Rademan v. Superior Court, B143617,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, January 22, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court was required to conduct in camera inspection of psychotherapist's patients' records to determine if crime/tort exception to psychotherapist-patient privilege applied to any information in those records.
|
|||||
| Nippon Credit Bank v. 1333 N. Cal. Blvd., Nos. A084401, A086021.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 23, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Partnership committed bad faith waste by failing to pay taxes on property which bank had secured interest. Failure substantially impaired that interest, was not caused by an economic downturn, and thus warranted punitive damages.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
