LexisNexis
  

Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - California - January 24, 2006

  
Bell v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, A110274, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Employer's motion to modify calculation of prejudgment interest awarded to employees was properly denied because employer waived any objection to 10 percent interest rate of Lab. Code, § 218.6, and Civ. Code, § 3289, and because trial court properly applied the 10 percent prejudgment interest rate provided by § 3289 to the accrual of unpaid wages.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Friese v. Superior Court, D046348, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Lackner v. North, C047061, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a personal injury action, triable issues of fact as to whether defendant high school student's conduct was reckless. The student, who crashed into plaintiff skier, rode his snowboard into a rest area at a high rate of speed without looking where he was heading and despite the fact he was unfamiliar with the terrain and the ski area in general.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Evans, A107822, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Although defendant argued that the sentencing judge violated his constitutional and statutory right of allocution by refusing to allow him to speak, the proceedings at issue complied with California's statutory right to allocution under Pen. Code, § 1200, because defendant did not seek to speak until after the judge had begun to pronounce sentence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Najera, D046044, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a case of vehicle theft and possession of burglary tools, the trial court did not err in failing to instruct sua sponte in the terms of CALJIC No. 2.15 on the significance of possession of recently stolen property; the instructions given were sufficient to educate the jury as to the permissible uses of all circumstantial evidence.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Quintero, D044768, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Sufficient evidence supported convictions for aggravated mayhem in violation of Pen. Code, § 205, and torture in violation of Pen. Code, § 206, where defendant repeatedly slashed the victim's face with a razor blade knife; the evidence indicated that defendant had the specific intent to maim and intent to cause cruel and extreme pain to the victim.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Wright, S128442, SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 24, 2006, Decided , January 24, 2006, Filed.
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Pizarro v. Lamb's Players Theatre, D045890, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 24, 2006, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: A local theater's decision to offer discount admission prices to "baby-boomers" (persons born between 1946 and 1964) to attend a musical about that generation did not involve an arbitrary class-based generalization and thus did not violate the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civ. Code, § 51 et seq.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

  www.lexisnexis.com |  About LexisNexis |  Terms & Conditions |  Customer Support |  Sitemap |  Contact Us
  CopyrightŠ 2008  LexisNexis®  All rights reserved.