 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Estate of Lahey, No. A085550.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, December 8, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Legal separation was final termination of wife's community property rights, and thus she was excluded from definition of "surviving spouse," therefore she could not claim to be a surviving spouse for purposes of intestacy.
|
|||||
| Fnb Mortgage Corp. v. Pac. General Corp., No. C030439.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, December 8, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In action arising from alleged construction defects, cross-claim for indemnity was barred by statute of limitations when underlying claim and that claim were not timely filed; statute could not be tolled.
|
|||||
| Friends of Sierra Madre v. City of Sierra Madre, B129139,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, December 8, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: An election passing an ordinance de-designating properties as historical landmarks did not take de-designation outside scope of state environmental statute, which required an environmental impact report for the project.
|
|||||
| KRAMER v. STATE FARM INS. CO., E022409,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, December 8, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Rodriguez, No. F029039.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, December 8, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: When conducting a limited remand hearing on whether an attorney's reasons for exercising peremptory challenges were race neutral under Wheeler/Batson, it was not mandatory for original trial judge to conduct hearing.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
