 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hermosa Beach Stop Oil Coalition v. City of Hermosa Beach, No. B138557.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Voter-adopted proposition applied to real party in interest's oil-drilling project, and application of proposition to the project was a valid exercise of city's police power that did not constitute an unconstitutional impairment of contract.
|
|||||
| People v. Lozano, F032226,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Sentence enhancement for intent to promote criminal conduct by gang members, plus sentence for conviction of firearm possession while promoting criminal conduct by gang members, were double punishment, so two-year enhancement was stayed.
|
|||||
| People v. Luera, No. B134479.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Conviction for possession of child pornography affirmed; statute was not unconstitutionally vague and did not violate right to privacy; evidence of possession was sufficient, and informant's identity did not need to be divulged.
|
|||||
| People v. McPherson, No. B135960.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 24, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's sentence was upheld because each act of rape by a different person was a crime committed on a separate occasion, and for sentencing purposes there was no distinction between the rapist and the person aiding and abetting the rape.
|
|||||
| Sites v. Superior Court, A092451,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 24, 2001, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Following a decision of the appellate division of the superior court, petitioners failed to demonstrate that transfer to the court of appeal was necessary to settle important questions of law.
|
|||||
| Washington Mutual Bank v. Superior Court, No. S070418.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Nationwide class certification of action against bank was reversed; trial court should not have granted certification without first determining the effect of the choice-of-law agreements at issue.
|
|||||
| Wilshire Ins. Co. v. Tuff Boy Holding, No. C034291.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 25, 2001, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Any party to an action in which it was alleged that two or more parties were joint tortfeasors was entitled to a hearing on the issue of the good faith of a settlement entered into by a plaintiff and one or more alleged tortfeasors.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
