LexisNexis
  
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.


   State Courts - California - January 27, 2000

  
Fairmont Ins. Co. v. Superior Court, No. S074581., SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, January 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In the case of a remand for new trial after reversal of a judgment on appeal, discovery was reopened as a matter of right, and last date for completing discovery was to be 15 days before date initially set for the new trial.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
In re Jose H., No. H019568., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Disposition order reversed because court lacked authority to commit appellant to county jail. Assault with force likely to produce great bodily injury was not a lesser included offense of battery with serious bodily injury.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Korean Phila. Presbyterian Church v. Cal. Presbytery, No. B134338., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Preliminary injunction was reversed, where injunction was overbroad, and many of the issues in the case were not properly justiciable because of their religious nature, unripeness, or absence of a party with standing.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Acuna, No. B131760., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was not subjected to an ex post facto law in denying his motion to expunge sentence, nor did the application of the amendment violate equal protection, due process, or the benefit of his plea bargain.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Am. Sur. Ins. Co., No. B133111., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: The order denying a surety's motion to vacate the bond forfeiture was reversed because it could not lawfully surrender criminal defendant to obtain exoneration of the bond after he was deported; he was detained by operation of federal law.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Hoover, No. E020011., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: In domestic violence case, proper standard for proving past conduct was by preponderance of evidence, not beyond reasonable doubt; thus, evidence of defendant's past conduct was sufficiently established by victim's testimony.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Madrigal, No. B129746., COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 27, 2000, Decided
View this case - free  

Overview: Appellant never attempted to inform the probation office of his whereabouts, used fictitious names, and a subsequent sentence was not in prison; thus, he was not guaranteed concurrent sentences for federal and state offenses.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
People v. Zaragoza, B128936, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 27, 2000, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: Defendant was entitled only to 15 percent of the time actually served even when the trial court stayed his sentence for second-degree murder; thus, the court modified the judgment and granted him only 33 days of conduct credit.

Search Cases for Free|Daily, Weekly or Monthly Research Subscription Offers|Case Summary Email Service - 50% off

  
Back to Top
  

 www.lexisnexis.com  |  About LexisNexis  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Customer Support  |  Contact Us
  Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.