 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Hahn v. Mirda, A112854,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 19, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A patient stated a fraudulent concealment action against her doctors because the doctors failed to tell her that a pathology report following her radical mastectomy indicated that she did not have cancer; their duty included not misrepresenting the nature of a medical condition. Therefore, patient's husband had a viable loss of consortium claim.
|
|||||
| Castillo v. Barrera, B188263,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In a case in which manager alleged boxer breached an oral agreement for manager to manage boxer's career, because the record as a whole established that manager acted as a manager without a written contract and without a license as required by Bus. & Prof. Code, § 18642, summary judgment was properly granted in favor of boxer.
|
|||||
| Jennifer P. v. Julian P., D049302,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Bufford, A108741,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
|
|||||
| People v. Nguyen, H028798,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 22, 2007, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant admitted the commission of an offense resulting in a juvenile adjudication, the Apprendi rule that a jury must find facts increasing statutory maximums did not bar use of the adjudication under Pen. Code, §§ 667, subd. (d)(3), 1170.12, subd. (b)(3), to enhance defendant's sentence for felony possession of a firearm by a felon.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Sitemap | Contact Us |
| CopyrightŠ 2008 LexisNexis® All rights reserved. |
