 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Nicole M. v. Sears, No. H019268.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, December 13, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The store had no duty to prevent assault in a parking lot, since low lighting and overgrown bushes did not make the property inherently dangerous, and the assault was not reasonably anticipated since there were no prior similar incidents.
|
|||||
| People v. Dacayana, B122454,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, December 13, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Appellant's statements were admissible, though not preceded by Miranda regarding right to counsel, and information gleaned during therapy which has some bearing is admissible necessary to prevent the threatened danger.
|
|||||
| Senate of the Cal. v. Jones, No. S083194.,
SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, December 13, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The challenged measure violated the single-subject rule of the California Constitution because provisions of the initiative measure were not "reasonably germane" to a single subject, but embraced at least two separate, unrelated subjects.
|
|||||
| People v. Hove, No. E022305.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, December 14, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A restitution order in the full amount of medical expenses caused by defendant's criminal conduct was proper even though the victim himself did not suffer any economic loss.
|
|||||
| Estate of Brenner, No. B119255.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SEVEN, December 15, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Photocopies of a testator's handwritten property dispositions, included in a handwritten will, satisfed the statutory requirement of a holographic will that the material provisions be in the handwriting of the testator.
|
|||||
| In re Arturo D., A085945,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, December 15, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Search of vehicle that found drug paraphernalia was unlawful because the search exceeded the scope of a search for registration documents.
|
|||||
| McGill v. M. J. Brock & Sons,Inc., E020452,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, December 15, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Plaintiffs' claims against defendant were not time barred; news reporting of highway project was not so pervasive that reasonable person would have been under duty to investigate project's potential impact on his property.
|
|||||
| Qualls v. Lake Berryessa Enters., Nos. A082385, A083003.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, December 15, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In dispute over placement of new mobile home at lake resort, plaintiffs were licensees rather than tenants under agreement with defendant resort, and plaintiffs could enforce license agreement via breach of contract action.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
