 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| Brian C. v. Ginger K., No G024911.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because child was not born into a normal marriage and because plaintiff developed a substantial relationship with child immediately upon her birth and for 11/2 years thereafter, he could bring an action to be declared father of child.
|
|||||
| Community Redevelopment Agency v. World Wide Enterprises, Inc., B122176,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: A trial court correctly precluded cross-examination of condemning agency's appraiser about prior inconsistent appraisal of the property where it was made only for purposes of calculating the deposit of probable compensation.
|
|||||
| County of Sacramento v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd., No. C030903.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Workers' Compensation Appeals Board's decision to set aside a stipulation between the parties was annulled, where record was devoid of any reason why party should not have been held to the stipulation.
|
|||||
| Duncan v. Dep't of Pers. Admin., No. B129036.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Due process clause does not entitle a public employee to a predeprivation hearing before he is demoted in lieu of layoff; a post-demotion hearing is sufficient.
|
|||||
| People v. Hightower, A081424,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FOUR, January 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Trial court did not err in removing juror upon finding that, although juror had doubts about state's case, substantial evidence showed doubts stemmed from previously undisclosed belief that son could not kill his mother.
|
|||||
| People v. Rodriguez, No. F031606.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 28, 2000, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Home office was functionally related to and immediately contiguous with home even without internal connecting door, sufficient to find first degree burglary; jury access to written instructions made any oral error harmless.
|
|||||
| Rose v. Superior Court, No. B134032,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION SIX, January 28, 2000, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Writ of mandate was issued ordering trial court to vacate order denying habeas petition, as order was flawed and petitioner made showing of ineffective assistance of counsel that was material and sufficiently adequate.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
