Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!

Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!

   State Courts - California - January 14, 2005

  
PEOPLE v. MORELLO, A104892, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 14, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. PARRAS, D043481, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 14, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. RANGER INS. CO., G033642, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, January 14, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. ROSENTHAL, B172627, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 14, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. SELF, F043526, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 14, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. SMITH, B173132, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE, January 14, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. TILLMAN, A105676, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 14, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. VALENZUELA, F044061, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 14, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
PEOPLE v. WALKER, B168784, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 14, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Search Cases for Free

  
People v. Martinez, C043341, COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, January 14, 2005, Filed
View this case - free  

Overview: In a torture case, the use of the victim's out-of-court statements at trial did not violate defendant's right to confrontation because the victim was present, testified, and submitted to cross-examination.

Search Cases for Free

  
Back to Top