|
|
| |
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases —
for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case —
for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
|
| |
State Courts -
California - January 24, 2007
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Manderville v. PCG&S Group, Inc., D047285,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Trial court erred in granting summary judgment to real estate brokers on a claim that they intentionally misrepresented the use of the property; although the contract provided that the buyers were to satisfy themselves as to representations regarding use, Civ. Code, ? 1668, did not allow anyone to be contractually exempted from liability for fraud.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Ross v. San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist., A110543,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, January 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District was immune from liability under Gov. Code, ? 815.2, as to a former employee's claims of discrimination and wrongful termination in violation of public policy. The claims came within the scope of Gov. Code, ??821.6, because they fell under the rubric of malicious prosecution discussed in case law.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Womack v. San Francisco Community College Dist., A112564,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION TWO, January 24, 2007, Filed
View this case - free
|
Overview: Temporary instructor was not entitled to reinstatement to a position with a community college district because he did not work more than 60 percent of a full-time assignment, as defined by the district, and therefore did not become a contract employee under Ed. Code, ?? 87482.5, 87604; the district had discretion to define a full-time assignment.
|
|
| |
Back to Top |
| |
|
Worldwide
Feedback
Feedback