 |
|
 |
|
|
Access State and Federal Case Law, plus U.S. Supreme Court cases — for free!
Click on any of the case links below to view the full text of that case — for free — through lexisONE®, a legal research and news service from LexisNexis®. Login is required — registration is free!
While viewing the full text of the case, select from upgrade options to Shepardize® or view the fully-featured case on lexis.com including Core Terms, Shepard's® Signals, Case Summaries, Print Options, and more. lexisONE offers access to comprehensive content and flexible services for faster, more efficient legal research. Review our flexible LexisNexis® subscriptions offered through daily, weekly or monthly research packages.
| People v. Trevino, B118891, B134606,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION THREE, December 21, 1999, Filed
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Proposition 8 was improperly applied to impose prior serious felony conviction enhancement based on appellant's prior Texas conviction, when appellant was 15 years old, and could not have been convicted in California.
|
|||||
| Bank of Am. v. Jennett, No. C029754.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, December 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Judgment entered by one state must be recognized by another if that state had jurisdiction over the subject matter and parties, and all interested parties were given reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard.
|
|||||
| Paredes v. Superior Court, No. B134960.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, December 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: In two successive actions a party may move to disqualify in each, or may disqualify in the later action without waiving that right by failing to so move in the earlier.
|
|||||
| People v. Cratty, No. C028843.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, December 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Because defendant was caught driving vehicle that had been stolen eight months before, conviction was for driving stolen vehicle rather than theft, therefore conviction could stand with receipt of stolen property conviction.
|
|||||
| Riverside County Cmty. Facilities Dist. v. Bainbridge 17, No. D030175.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, December 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: The tax assessment on appellants' property was a special tax under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act, not a special assessment, and appellee was entitled to foreclose on the special tax liens.
|
|||||
| Riverwatch v. County of San Diego, No. D030732.,
COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, December 22, 1999, Decided
View this case - free |
|||||
Overview: Environmental Impact Report of a rock quarry failed to consider air pollution, but report did not need to consider prior illegal activity on the site; Permit Streamlining Act did not render objections to the quarry moot.
|
|||||
Back to Top
| www.lexisnexis.com | About LexisNexis | Terms & Conditions | Customer Support | Contact Us |
| Copyright® 2009 LexisNexis , a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
